MEDIASI IN COURT UNTUK MEWUJUDKAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM BERDASARKAN WIN –WIN SOLUTION

Anita Afriana

Abstract



ABSTRACT

Basically, same with the civil settlement in the District Court, peace in the
settlement of bankruptcy cases is required to be implemented. The article of
130 of HIR / 154 HIR concerning the obligation to reconcile the two sides have
been concreted through Perma No 1, year 2016. However, this Perma can’t be

applied to the settlement of bankruptcy cases in the Commercial Court. This study want to know the juridical reasons the peace achieved through Mediation In Court based on Perma no. 1 of 2016 can’t be applied in the settlement of bankruptcy disputes in the Commercial Court and the juridical consequences that distinguish between the peace achieved through mediation in Court and the bankruptcy proceedings and PKPU related to certainty as the purpose of law Peace institutions through Perma No1, year 2016 pursued by means of mediation can not be applied to bankruptcy cases because bankruptcy is included in the volunteer domain whereas mediation in court is implemented in contentiosa case. Therefore, peace in the settlement of bankruptcy cases can’t be executed at the beginning of the investigation of bankruptcy cases in the Commercial Court, as new peace can be applied if the debtor's status is clear as a bankrupt party. Although mediation can’t be implemented in order to achieve peace in the bankruptcy case in the Commercial Court, the concept of a win-win solution remains in the implementation of peace in the Commercial Court is a
peace that can provide balanced benefits for both parties as business actors.

Keywords: bankruptcy, peace, win-win Solution


Keywords


bankruptcy, peace, win-win Solution

Full Text:

PDF

References


Fuady, Munir Arbitrase Nasional, Citra Aditya Bhakti, Bandung, 2000.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno, Bunga Rampai Ilmu Hukum, Penerbit Liberty, Yogyakarta, 1980.

Nating, Imran, Peranan dan tanggung Jawab Kurator dalam Pengurusan dan

Pemberesan Harta Pailit, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, cet 1, Jakarta, 2004

Sembiring, Sentosa, Hukum Kepailitan dan Peraturan Perundang-undangan yang Terkait Dengan Kepailitan, Nuansa Aulia, Bandung, 2006.

Yani, Ahmad dan Widjaja, Gunawan, Kepailitan, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2004.

Peraturan Perundang-undangan:

Undang-undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan

Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.

Undang-undang No. 48 tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman

PerMa No. 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan

Sumber Lain

www. hukumonline.co.id/mediasi di pengadilan.html www. kompasina.com/ kepastian hukum/




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35334/ay.v2i2.1548

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 JURNAL AKTA YUDISIA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


INDEKS:

width="50"    width="60"    



JURNAL AKTA YUDISIA
Faculty of Law, Universitas Borneo Tarakan
Jalan Amal Lama Nomor 01, Tarakan, Kalimantan Utara - Phone 082188161481

Lisensi Creative Commons

Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial 4.0 Internasional.