UNDERSTANDING FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE IN A LITERARY WORK THROUGH LITERATURE CIRCLE

Oka Rodi Putra, Puspita Devi

Abstract


This article is launched based on the highly seriously significant problems that are faced by the students in literature class. They are dealing with students’ interest and motivation in learning literature. Most of students are uninterested in and unmotivated to learn about literature since they find difficulties in understanding figurative language. In fact, students do not get the point on how the figurative language is used to illustrate the implied meaning of the passage. Understanding figurative language can be perfectly retrieved through a cooperative learning, that is, literature circles. Literature circles is a temporary discussion groups between students who have chosen to read the same book in which each of the students has their own roles that differ from one another. When students are given a voice in what they read, they are more likely to learn and enjoy the experience. Additionally, their learning deepens their knowledge and becomes more meaningful to them.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Brock J., Norbury C., Einav S., Nation K. (2008). Do individuals with autism process words in context? Evidence from language-mediated eye-movements. Cognition 108, 896–904. 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.007 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Burns, B. (1998). Changing the classroom climate with literature circles. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 42(2), 124-130. Retrieved June 8, 2008 from EBSCO Host database.

Carrison, C., Ernst-Slavit, G., Spiesman-Laughlin, J. (2009). Creating opportunities for “grand conversations” among ELLs with literature circles. In J. Coppola & E.Primas (Eds.), One classroom, many learners: best literacy practices for today’s multilingual classrooms. (pp.91-117). International Reading Association.

Coulson S. (2005). “The Literal/Nonliteral distinction,” in The Literal and the Nonliteral in Language and Thought, eds Coulson S., Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk B., editors. (Berlin: Peter Lang), 9–22.

DaLie, S. O. (2001). Students becoming real readers: Literature circles in high school English classes, in Ericson, B.O. (Ed.), Teaching Reading in High School English Classes. Urbana: NCTE, 84-100.

Daniels, H. (2002). Literature Circles: Voice and Choice in Book Clubs and Reading Groups. Maine: Stenhouse Publishers.

Daniels, H. (2006). What's the next big thing with literature circles? Voices from the Middle, 13(4), 10.

Fall, R.; Webb, N.; Chudowsky, N. (2000). "Group discussion and large-scale language arts assessment: Effects on students' comprehension". American Educational Research Journal. 37(4): 911–942. doi:10.3102/00028312037004911.

Ferguson, L., & Kern, D. (2012). Re-visioning literature circles: Incorporating comprehension strategy instruction in student-led discussions. New England Reading Association Journal, 47(2), 23.

FKIP UNBARA. (2014). Buku pedoman fakultas keguruan dan ilmu pendidikan universitas baturaja. Baturaja: FKIP UNBARA

Gibbs, R. W. (1999). “Figurative language,” in The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Science, eds Wilson R., Keil F., editors. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press;), 314–315.

Gold R., Faust M., Goldstein A. (2010). Semantic integration during metaphor comprehension in Asperger syndrome. Brain Lang. 113, 124–134. 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.03.002 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Heydon, R. (2003). Literature circles as a differentiated instructional strategy for including ESL students in mainstream classrooms. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 463-475.

Kasten, Wendy. (1995). Literature Circles for the teaching of literature-based reading. In M. Radencich & L. mCkAY (Eds.). Flexible Grouping for Literacy in the Elementary Grades. 66-80. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Kennedy, XJ. (1983). Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry and Drama. Boston: Little Brown and Company.

Lehman, B.A., & Scharer, P.L. (1996). Reading alone, talking together: The role of discussion in developing literary awareness. The Reading Teacher, 50(1), 26-35. Retrieved June 8, 2008 from EBSCO Host database.

Levorato M.C., Cacciari C. (2002). The creation of new figurative expressions: psycholinguistic evidence in Italian children, adolescents and adults. J. Child Lang. 29, 127–150. 10.1017/s0305000901004950 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Lin, C. (2004). Literature circles. Teacher Librarian, 31(3), 23.

Long, T.W., & Gove, M.K. (2003). How engagement strategies and literature circles promote critical response in a fourth-grade urban classroom. The Reading Teacher, 57(4), 350-360. Retrieved June 8, 2008 from EBSCO Host database.

Norbury, C. F. (2005). The relationship between theory of mind and metaphor: evidence from children with language impairment and autistic spectrum disorders. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 23, 383–399 10.1348/026151005x26732 [Cross Ref]

Ogbulogo, C. (2005). Concepts on Semantics. Lagos Sam Publication.

Ogunsiji, A. (2000). “Introductory Semantics” In Babajide, A.O. (ed) Studies in English Language. Ibadan: Enicrownfit Publishers.

PISA (2012). What students know and can do: studentperformance in mathematic, reading and science. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/PISA-2012-results-snapshot-Volume-I/ENG/pdf

Vulchanova M., Talcott J., Vulchanov V., Stankova M. (2012a). Language against the odds, or rather not: the weak central coherence hypothesis and language. J. Neurolinguistics 25, 13–30 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2011.07.004 [Cross Ref]

Vulchanova M., Talcott J., Vulchanov V., Stankova M., Eshuis H. (2012b). Morphology in autism spectrum disorders: local processing bias and language. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 29, 584–600. 10.1080/02643294.2012.762350 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Wilfong, L. G. (2009). Textmasters: Bringing literature circles to textbook reading across the curriculum: This strategy enables teachers to use literature circles with not just content area trade books but textbooks too. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(2), 164.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35334/bonjour%20election.v1i1.828

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.