PROFIL PENGETAHUAN HAKIKAT SAINS CALON GURU PENDIDIKAN BIOLOGI DI UNIVERSITAS BORNEO TARAKAN
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the understanding of biology teacher candidates at the University of Borneo Tarakan regarding the nature of science. This type of research is a qualitative descriptive study. The instruments used were test questions and questionnaire sheets. The results of the research on understanding the nature of science for 121 biology teacher candidates at the University of Borneo Tarakan showed that the understanding of the nature of science for biology teacher candidates was categorized as good. The highest score for understanding the nature of science by prospective teachers on the aspect of creativity is 78, while the lowest score for understanding the nature of science by prospective teachers on the aspects of tentative and socio-cultural embeddednes is 65.
Â
Keywords: Â nature of science, biology teacher candidates
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abrori, F. M. (2012). Analisis Kesalahan Konsep Buku Teks Pelajaran Biologi Bse (Buku Sekolah Elektronik) Sma Kelas X Semester 1 (Doctoral dissertation, University of Muhammadiyah Malang).
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417–436
Abidin, Y. (2017). Pembelajaran Literasi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Adi, W. (2010). Pemahaman Hakikat Sains Pada Guru dan Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: Jurnal Pendidikan, 10 (1), 2018.
Annisa, M. & Listiani (2017). Pemahaman aspek-aspek dalam hakikat sains (nature of science) oleh guru sekolah dasar di wilayah 4P (pedalaman, perbatasan, perkotaan, dan pesisir). Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 1(4), 241-246.
Bell, R. L. (2009). Teaching the nature of science: Three critical questions. Best Practices in Science Education, 22, 1-6.
Buaraphan, K. (2009). Preservice and inservice science teachers responses and reasoning about the nature of science. Educational Research and Reviews, 4(11), 561-581.
Cakmakci, G. (2012). Promoting Pre-Service Teachers' Ideas about Nature of Science through Educational Research Apprenticeship. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(2), 114-135.
Carin, A. A., & Sund, R. B. (1989). Teaching science through discovery (Vol. 1). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Clough, M. P. (2008). We All Teach the Nature of Science-Whether Accurately or Not. Iowa Science Teachers Journal, 35(2), 2-3.
Dogan, N., & Abdâ€Elâ€Khalick, F. (2008). Turkish grade 10 students' and science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: A national study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 45(10), 1083-1112.
Imran, M. E., & Wibowo, A. (2018). Profil Pemahaman Nature Of Science (NNOS) Di Sekolah Dasar. JKPD (Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dasar), 3(2), 540-557.
Jumanto, J., & Widodo, A. (2018). Pemahaman hakikat sains oleh siswa dan guru SD di kota Surakarta. Jurnal Komunikasi Pendidikan, 2(1), 20-31.
Jumanto, J. & Widodo, A. (2018). Pemahaman Hakikat Sains Oleh Siswa Dan Guru SD di Kota Surabaya. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: Jurnal Komunikasi Pendidikan,2 (1)
KaraKaş, M. (2008). A study of undergraduate students ‘perceptions about nature of science. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy (BJSEP), 2(2), 223-249.
Koksal, M. S., & Cakiroglu, J. (2010). Examining Science Teacher's Understandings of the NOS Aspects through the Use of Knowledge Test and Open-Ended Questions. Science Education International, 21(3), 197-211.
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of research in science teaching, 29(4), 331-359.
Lederman, N. G., Abdâ€Elâ€Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of research in science teaching, 39(6), 497-521.
Listiani, L., & Kusuma, A. E. (2017). View of nature of science (VNOS) form B: An instrument for assessing pre-service teacher’s view of nature of science at Borneo University Tarakan. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 3(1), 45-54.
McComas, W. F. (2015). The nature of science & the next generation of biology education. The American Biology Teacher, 77(7), 485-491.
McComas, W. F., Almazroa, H., & Clough, M. P. (1998). The nature of science in science education: An introduction. Science & Education, 7(6), 511-532.
Meichtry, Y. J. (1993). The impact of science curricula on student views about the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(5), 429-443.
Putriana, D., Dyah, I.P., Krisianti A.M., Nisa, D. A., Aris, S.B., & Siti, M. Analisis kesesuaian isi buku-buku IPA terhadap standar isi K13 revisi. SEMINAR NASIONAL PENDIDIKAN IPA KE-X, 113-117
Ratnawati, E. (2013). Pemahaman Hakikat Sains (NOS) Mahasiswa Tahun Ketiga Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia Universitas Negeri Malang (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Negeri Malang).
Schwartz, R. (2007). What's in a word? How word choice can develop (mis) conceptions about the nature of science. Science Scope, 42.
Siahaan, P., & Suyana, I. (2010). Hakikat Sains dan Pembelajaran Sains. Handout Pelatihan Guru MIPA Papua Barat Tahun 2010.
Susantini, E., Rachmadiarti, F., Purnomo, T., Raharjo, M. S., Ducha, N., Wisanti, M. S., ... & Si, S. (2013). KUMPULAN MAKALAH SEMINAR NASIONAL BIOLOGI–IPA 2013.
Susilawati. (2009). Analisis Kemunculan Aspek-Aspek Hakikat Sains Dalam Praktik Pembelajaran Sains Di Sekolah Dasar Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Tesis. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Tursinawati, T. (2016). Penguasaan konsep hakikat sains dalam pelaksanaan percobaan pada pembelajaran IPA di SDN Kota Banda Aceh. Pesona Dasar: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Humaniora, 2(4), 72-84.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35334/biopedagogia.v2i1.1709
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Abstracted/Indexed by:
 
 
 
 
 
 
