Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics

The editorial board of BIOPEDAGOGIA establishes the Journal's scientific publication ethics in order to preserve the caliber of papers and prevent publication infractions. The rule of the head of the scientific institution No. 5 of 2014 regarding the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publications, which comprises provisions for Ethics for Scientific publications, is the foundation for this publishing ethic.

The following Publication Ethics document outlines the standards of conduct for all individuals engaged in the publication of a manuscript. It is relevant to authors, editors, bestari partners and reviewers, as well as journal and editor managers.

All parties involved must respect certain ethical standards when publishing, including

  1. Neutrality, or the absence of conflicts of interest in the publication management;
  2. Justice, namely granting authorship rights to individuals who are legitimate authors;
  3. Honesty, including the absence of plagiarism, fabrication, falsification, and copying in publications.

Editor-in-Chief and Manager of the BIOPEDAGOGIA Journal

  1. Journal publishers are required to set up staff and other resources, including the availability of funding sources for the continuance of journal publication, licensing and other legal considerations, as well as developing networks for collaboration and marketing.
  2. Journal publishers must create journal management standards, review them, and submit them to authors/writers, editorial boards, bestari partners, and readers.
  3. A journal publisher is in charge of publishing papers that have undergone editing, review, and layout procedures in accordance with the standards for publishing scientific journals and routinely releases publications.
  4. Publishers are in charge of ensuring academic freedom for editors and Mitrabestari in carrying out their various roles in order to create a pleasant working environment.
  5. Publishers of journals are required to ensure and uphold copyright.
  6. Journal editors must make publication findings public and advertise them by promising the public benefits of using the material.
  7. Maintain the privacy of all contributing researchers, authors, editors, and Bestari partners.
  8. Put in place rules and guidelines for intellectual property rights, particularly copyrights.

Code of Ethics for Editors

When deciding whether to approve or reject a manuscript, the editor makes sure that the review process is comprehensive, transparent, objective, fair, and sensible.

  1. The editor is in charge of selecting the papers that should be published through a board of editors meeting that takes into account the relevant legal requirements for plagiarism, defamation, copyright infringement, duplication, and data fabrication.
  2. The editorial staff makes decisions about which manuscripts to publish based on the principle of equality of treatment, without taking into account the author's race, gender, religion, ethnicity, nationality, or political viewpoint.
  3. Except with the authors' agreement, the editor and editorial staff will not divulge any information about manuscripts or submitted papers.
  4. If a manuscript is not accepted for publication, the editor will return it to the author without using it for personal gain.
  5. Addressing the demands of readers and writers.
  6. Boosting authors' and writers' confidence to help them better their writing so that it is publishable. Attempt to sustainably raise the standard of publications.
  7. Create a procedure to guarantee the caliber of papers released.
  8. Give freedom of expression a high priority.
  9. Whenever necessary, providing rectifications, elaborations, withdrawals, and apology.
  10. While the author/writer is in charge of the written work's style and format but is solely responsible for its substance and all statements made within,
  11. Keep an open mind when it comes to fresh ideas or other people's perspectives that might contradict with your own. does not defend one's own opinion, the author's, or any other party that could lead to an unbiased choice.

For Reviewers

  1. Reviewers must comment on ethical questions and possible violations of research and publication.
  2. Reviewers will do the work on time and must notify the editor if they cannot complete the work.
  3. Reviewers need to maintain the confidentiality of the manuscript.
  4. Reviewers may not accept to review texts with a potential conflict of interest between them and any writer.

Code of Ethics for Authors

  1. The author must clearly and honestly report the findings of his or her research, free of plagiarism, data fabrication, data falsification, and duplication.
  2. In addition to keeping their research data maintained appropriately and securely, authors are required to give the editor with information regarding the methodology and findings of their research in a straightforward, honest, and thorough manner.
  3. The author is responsible for making sure that the text he sends to the editor is original, produced by him, based on his own ideas, and does not contain any material that was plagiarized from the work of others.
  4. The author is required to state that the material being sent or submitted to the editor has never been sent or submitted to another journal or publication publisher.
  5. If an error in the manuscript's writing is discovered, the author is required to notify the editor as soon as possible. The significance and substance of the text can be diminished by writing names, affiliations/agencies, quotations, and other things. If it occurs, the author must immediately suggest edits to the work.
  6. To prevent conflicts of interest with other parties and ensure that submissions are handled efficiently and safely, authors must comprehend the aforementioned ethical principles of scientific publication.
  7. The written manuscript's confirmation, which has been submitted, is the author's responsibility.
  8. Authors are required to cite any quotes from other people's writings and ideas.
  9. Authors must adhere to all applicable rules for scientific writing and produce articles in an ethical, truthful, and responsible manner.
  10. The author has no objections to the manuscript being edited throughout review and layout as long as the writing's core concepts remain intact.