PERBANDINGAN KOMPLIKASI IBU PADA EMERGENCY CESAREAN SECTIION(Emcs) DENGAN ELECTIVE CESAREAN SECTION (EICS):REVIEW

ika Yulianti

doi:10.35334/borticalth.v2i1.662

PERBANDINGAN KOMPLIKASI IBU PADA EMERGENCY CESAREAN SECTIION(Emcs) DENGAN ELECTIVE CESAREAN SECTION (EICS):REVIEW

ika Yulianti

Abstract

Insiden bedah cesar meningkat di seluruh dunia, namun tingkat morbiditas dan mortalitas pada ibu mencapai meningkat. Tindakan SC terbagi atas seksio sesarea darurat (EMC) dan seksio sesarea elektif (EICS). Beberapa studi melaporkan EICS dapat mengurangi insiden morbiditas dan mortalitas ibu. Penelitian ini merupakan tinjauan yang dilakukan dengan mencari dan menseleksi artikel pada kurun waktu 2000-2018. Data penelitian yang diharapkan beberapa pengindeksan yang diharapkan: PubMed, Science Direct, Web of science, Springer Link dan Cochrane Database. Pencarian akan dilakukan paling lama 1 minggu. Hasil penelusuran menemukan 5 artikel yang menarik 13063 data pasien diambil dari kerumitan Emcs lebih tinggi dibandingkan Eics.komplikasi paling sering antaralain: infeski, demam, ISK, dehisensi luka, DIC, dan operasi ulang

kata kunci: seksio sesarea darurat (EMC), seksio sesarea elektif (Eics)

Full Text:

PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

ACO Obstetricians gynecologists(2014) Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery.Am J Obstet Gynecol 210:179-193

Benzouina, S.et al.(2016) Fetal outcome in emergency versus elective cesarean section at Souissi Maternity Hospital, Rabat, Morocco, The Pan African medical journal,23,p.197. doi:10.11604/pamj.2016.23.197.7401

Biondi-Zoccai, G.et al(2011) The rough guide to systematic review and meta-analysis, HSR proceeding in intensive care and cardiovascular anesthesia, 3,pp.161-73

Chongsuvivatwong, V.et al(2010) Maternal and fetal mortality and complications associated with cesarean section deliveries in teaching hospitals in Asia, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research, 36(1),pp.45-51,doi:10.1111/j.1447-0756.2009.01100.x.

Dahlke, J.D.et al.(2013) Evidence based surgery for cesarean delivery: An update systematic review, American journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.043

Diana, V. and Tipandjan, A(2016) Emergency and elective cesarean section: comparison of maternal and fetal outcomes in a suburban tertiary care hospital in Puducherry, International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 5(9),pp.3060-3065.doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20162985.

Ghazi, A.et al.(2012) Maternal morbidity in emergency versus elective caesarean section at tertiary care hopital., Journal of Ayub Medical College, 24(1),pp.10-13

Hamilton BE. Martin JA, Ventura SJ(2013) Births:preliminary data for 2012. Natk Vital Stat Rep 62:1-17

McCarthy, F.P.et al.(2007) A new way of looking at cesarean section births, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetric and Gynecology.doi:10.1111/j.1479-828x.00753.x.

Vogel, J.P. et al.(2015) Use of the robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: A secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys, The Lancet Global Health. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70094-X.

Yang, X.J. and Sun, S.S(2017) Comparison of maternal and fetal complications in elective and emergency cesarean section:a systematic review and meta-analysis, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 296(3),pp.503-512.doi:10.1007/s00404-017-4445-2

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35334/borticalth.v2i1.662