PENINGKATKAN MOTIVASI DAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR TINGKAT TINGGI SISWA MELALUI PEMBELAJARAN PREDICT-OBSERVE-EXPLAIN PADA MATERI KERAGAMAN HAYATI

Arbayati Arbayati

Abstract


Motivation to learn is the power to direct or maintain a goal in learning. Learning motivation is able to influence students' thinking ability. Students' learning motivation and thinking skills can be improved through active learning, namely predict-observe-explain (POE). This study aims to increase students' motivation and higher order thinking skills through the implementation of POE in biodiversity learning. This classroom action research consisted of two cycles, with a sample of 37 students. This research was conducted in August-September 2020 which consisted of planning, implementing actions, observing, and reflecting. The research instrument consisted of a learning motivation questionnaire and a test of biodiversity description. The results showed that the mean learning motivation in the first cycle was 58.37 in the criteria of sufficiently motivated, in the second cycle 64.97 was categorized as sufficiently motivated and the average high level thinking ability of students in the first cycle was 53.51, then there was an increase in the second cycle, namely 79.27. The conclusion in this study is the application of the POE model can improve learning motivation and high-order thinking skills of class X MIPA 2 SMA Negeri 3 Tarakan on the subject of Biodiversity.

 

Keywords:  Motivation, higher order thinking skill, predict observe explain


Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). Taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Banawi, A., Sopandi, W., Kadarohman, A., & Solehuddin, M. (2019). Prospective Primary School Teachers’ Conception Change on States of Matter and Their Changes through Predict-ObserveExplain Strategy. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 359-374. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12322a

Cinici, A. & Demir, Y. (2013). Teaching through cooperative POE tasks: a path to conceptual change. The Clearing House, 86: 1-10.

Cos¸tu, B., Ayas, A., & Niaz, M. (2012). Investigating the effectiveness of a poe-based teaching activity on students’ understanding of condensation. InstrSci, 40, 47–67.

Danar, V. F. (2012). Hubungan Motivasi Belajar Intrinsik dan Ekstrinsik Siswa dengan Prestasi Belajar Siswa Kelas X Kompetensi Keahlian Teknik Audio Video SMK Ma’arif 1 Wates. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran. Vol 2.

DÅ‘rnyei, Z. (2001). Motivating strategies in the foreign language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667343

Fuadi, F., Sopandi, W., Priscylio, G., Hamdu, G., & Mustikasari, L. (2020). Students’ Conceptual Changes on the Air Pressure Learning Using Predict-Observe-Explain Strategy. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 7(1), 70-85. doi:https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v7i1.22457

Hilario, J.S. (2015). The Use of Predict-Observe-Explain-Explore (POEE) as a New Teaching Strategy in General Chemistry Laboratory. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(3), 38-39.

James, D. (2010). Practical eTeaching Strategies for Predict – Observe – Explain ProblemBased Learning and Role Plays. Australia: LAMS International Australia.

Juniari, N.K, Kusmariyatni, N., & Margunayasa, I.G. (2014). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran POE Dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas V SD. Jurnal Mimbar PGSD Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Jurusan PGSD 2(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v2i1.3107

Kemmis, S. and McTaggart, R. 1988. The Action Researh Reader. Victoria, Deakin University Press.

Kibirige, I., Osodo, J., & Tlala, K. M. (2014). The effect of predict-observe-explain strategy on learners’ misconceptions about dissolved salts. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 300-310.

Kormos, J. (2012). The role of individual differences in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21 (4), 390-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.003

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2

Kurniati, D., Harimukti, R., & Jamil, N.A. (2016). Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa SMP di Kabupaten Jember dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Berstandar PISA. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 142-155.

Liu, W. C., Wang, J. C. K., & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.) (2016). Building Autonomous Learners: Perspectives from Research and Practice using Self-Determination Theory. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-630-0

Nurtjahyani, S., D. & Setyowati, S. (2014). Peningkatan motivasi belajar biologi dengan model pembelajaran berbasis masalah siswa SMP Islam 4-5 Tambakboyo. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 6(1), 58-82.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 tahun 2018.

Santrock, J W. (2002). Live Span Development, Alih Bahasa: Achmad Chusairi, Perkembangan Masa Hidup, Edisi Kelima, Jilid 1-2. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Sari, W. (2013). Hubungan Motivasi Belajar dengan Hasil belajar PKn Pada Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negeri 1 Kranggan Temanggung. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran. Vol 15

Warsono & Hariyanto. (2014). Pembelajaran Aktif: Teori dan Assesmen. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

ZorluoÄŸlu S. L. (2020). Analysis of 5th Grade Science Learning Outcomes and Exam Questions According to Revised Bloom Taxonomy. Journal of Educational Issues 6(1), 58-69.

Zorluoğlu, S. L., Bağrıyanık, K. E., & Şahintürk, A. (2019). Analyze of the science and technology course Teog questions based on the revised Bloom taxonomy and their relation between the learning outcomes of the curriculum. International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(2), 104-117. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2019.189.8




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35334/biopedagogia.v2i2.1723

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Abstracted/Indexed by:

Dimensions Sinta Science and Technology Index Google Scholar Garuda   

Creative Commons License